<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post3017330506728719537..comments</id><updated>2009-11-10T09:29:30.311-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on RotoSavants.com: Rotosavants' Top 100(+2) for 2010: Part 3</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/feeds/3017330506728719537/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html'/><author><name>Troy Patterson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08259324226746213633</uri><email>TroyPatterson@rotosavants.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-5233276365115347286</id><published>2009-11-10T09:29:30.311-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-10T09:29:30.311-05:00</updated><title type='text'>No worries, bro. Didn't take offense. Just continu...</title><content type='html'>No worries, bro. Didn&amp;#39;t take offense. Just continuing the discussion/debate. =)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think it&amp;#39;s quite interesting to see who didn&amp;#39;t make it. This is actually why I don&amp;#39;t make strict, number-order lists when I go into my own drafts: these are very comparable guys. For what it&amp;#39;s worth, I do still think Rollins is a top SS. Just not as top as some other SS options, and other hitters. And I think were I to redo some of my picks, I&amp;#39;d probably put Sabathia up there, instead of Hallady. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My ranks are always changing; to use Joe Maddon&amp;#39;s term, they&amp;#39;re &amp;quot;slightly amorphous.&amp;quot;  =)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/5233276365115347286'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/5233276365115347286'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html?showComment=1257863370311#c5233276365115347286' title=''/><author><name>Kevin Jebens</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02627565567734620532</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='15951568638248138113'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-3017330506728719537' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/posts/default/3017330506728719537' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-3530304415061906734</id><published>2009-11-09T22:45:32.884-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-09T22:45:32.884-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Kevin: I was by no means saying the top 100 you gu...</title><content type='html'>Kevin: I was by no means saying the top 100 you guys provide is &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; in any way.  I know each one of us has preferences, and different guidelines to look at players with.  Honestly, I can agree with you on almost everything you said.  I was just saying I was surprised to have not seen some of those names.  Some of those players have put up comparable or superior numbers than the ones that DID make the cut.  But I was quite aware that most of the names I listed were older veterans, or have not shown consistency.  Some people would probably argue that Rollins is still a top SS, or that Sabathia had the best numbers overall, or something like that.  Just trying to get a discussion on it, is all.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/3530304415061906734'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/3530304415061906734'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html?showComment=1257824732884#c3530304415061906734' title=''/><author><name>Mark Jebens</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-3017330506728719537' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/posts/default/3017330506728719537' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-876637279634624498</id><published>2009-11-09T14:05:23.509-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-09T14:05:23.509-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Mark,

I agree that our top 100 isn't perfect by a...</title><content type='html'>Mark,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I agree that our top 100 isn&amp;#39;t perfect by any means. And you can see our obvious bias for young, up-and-coming hitters. Though all are certainly valuable, here are some of my personal reasons why I didn&amp;#39;t choose some of the players you list.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that Sabathia isn&amp;#39;t up there IS a bit shocking. But I&amp;#39;m scared of his consistently high IP and pitch counts. He&amp;#39;s young and can take it, and he&amp;#39;ll probably be fine for years to come, but look at what happened to Kerry Wood and Mark Prior. Just saying.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for Rollins, he&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;old&amp;quot; compared to some of the other guys, and I like upside. Plus, I tend to undervalue him because so many people overvalue him and assume he&amp;#39;ll put up a 30+ HR season with 40 SB (not gonna happen).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bay was a top-30 player in points leagues last year. But if he doesn&amp;#39;t end up back in Boston, I think his value takes a hit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jeter is older, and until 2009 he was on a slow but steady decline. Abreu has to maintain his high SB total to have super value, and he&amp;#39;s getting up there in age.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think Morneau and Pedroia are overvalued. But they&amp;#39;re still worthy of a pick in the 30s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cano seems to have blossomed, and he could certainly be included. I like Aaron Hill, but Cano could do just as well in 2010, with a better AVG.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/876637279634624498'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/876637279634624498'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html?showComment=1257793523509#c876637279634624498' title=''/><author><name>Kevin Jebens</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02627565567734620532</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='15951568638248138113'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-3017330506728719537' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/posts/default/3017330506728719537' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-2237514581762160680</id><published>2009-11-08T00:07:48.885-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-08T00:07:48.885-05:00</updated><title type='text'>I don't care WHAT you guys say, I'm keeping David ...</title><content type='html'>I don&amp;#39;t care WHAT you guys say, I&amp;#39;m keeping David Wright!!!!  (I have to have confidence in him - he&amp;#39;s my franchise)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&amp;#39;t think I&amp;#39;ll nitpick on who goes where.  Obviously, it&amp;#39;s you guys kinda choosing a player one by one, taking turns if you will.  Each person has a preference, of course.  I have a good feeling who will be included in the next bunch...  But I also seriously am surprised that some of these names got beat out in the last batch.  I love each of the players 30-36 (except maybe Dunn), but I don&amp;#39;t know if they&amp;#39;re much better than a few of the following:  Dustin Pedroia, Jimmy Rollins, Morneau, Bay, Manny, and the Yankee combos of Jeter, Abreu, and Cano.  Granted, I don&amp;#39;t really like any of them, but some of those players I think deserve higher than 40.  That&amp;#39;s not even mentioning some of the pitchers that are coming next (I really thought Sabathia or Carpenter might have even made the top 40), but I know usually, in most Fantasy formats, pitchers are not considered as valuable.  Just some thoughts.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/2237514581762160680'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/3017330506728719537/comments/default/2237514581762160680'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html?showComment=1257656868885#c2237514581762160680' title=''/><author><name>Mark Jebens</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.rotosavants.com/2009/11/rotosavants-top-1002-for-2010-part-3.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1394540065179977992.post-3017330506728719537' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1394540065179977992/posts/default/3017330506728719537' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>